Certain dog breeds are considered challenging to train, not due to a lack of intelligence, but often because of their independent and stubborn nature. For instance, the Afghan hound is notorious for requiring up to 80 repetitions to comprehend a new command, which has led experts to label it as one of the least obedient breeds. While it is important to note that no dog breed is truly 'stupid,' some dogs learn commands at a slower pace than others, with variations in the types of intelligence they express.

Read More

Dr. Stanley Coren, a neuropsychologist and dog trainer, established a ranking system for dog intelligence in his 1994 book "The Intelligence of Dogs." This scale assesses dogs based on adaptive intelligence, instinctive intelligence, and obedience. According to Coren's criteria, breeds like the Afghan hound exhibit low obedience and working intelligence, primarily because their evolutionary background emphasizes different skills.

The Saluki, another breed high on the list of less trainable dogs, originated in Iraq and is similarly known for its sensitivity and difficulty in training. The Basenji, also a sighthound, is known for its independence and cat-like behaviors, which complicate training efforts. Bulldogs, originally developed for bull baiting in England, are recognized for their laziness and stubbornness, often leading to slow learning of commands. Chow chows exhibit a willful nature that makes training a particular challenge, requiring firm yet positive reinforcement.

Borzoi, a large sighthound from Russia, can be independent and require patience during training, benefiting from shorter, more engaging sessions. Bloodhounds are easily distracted by scents, making training for obedience challenging, although they excel in tracking. The Pekingese, known for its distinctive appearance and history as a sacred companion in ancient China, is another breed that embodies independence, further complicating training.

Despite their reputation, many of these breeds possess intelligence in other forms. For example, Beagles demonstrate food motivation that can be leveraged during training, while Mastiffs are often seen as calm and laid-back, yet may bore easily during sessions.

Experts argue that intelligence in dogs is multifaceted and influenced by genetics and specific breed purposes. Dr. Brian Hare emphasizes that measuring canine intelligence is complex and suggests that no clear distinction exists between 'smart' and 'dumb' dogs. Dudi Freeman, a trainer at the “Let the Animals Live” shelter, asserts that breed compatibility in temperament and communication with owners is more important than intelligence.

Each dog has unique strengths, and understanding a breed’s characteristics can lead to a successful training experience. As Freeman points out, many loving dogs, regardless of their perceived intelligence, deserve a chance at a warm, supportive home.